« We're getting flights from China! Now what? | Main | Music Post: When classical music goes Latin »

06/16/2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Although I have always been a registered Democrat, I have never been a fan of either Clinton.

Both Clinton and Weiner clearly have issues with impulse control, but Weiner ultimately did the honorable thing by resigning. Clinton didn't, and [in my opinion] damaged the office.

One wonders what Bill would have been up to if all today's social media outlets existed back then...

I didn't find myself drawing comparisons with Clinton so much as I did with other politicians who committed offenses of varying degrees, whether sexually scandalous in nature or just plain illegal, and yet held on to their office.

And I did find myself wondering why Weiner-gate seemed to resonate so deeply with the media and the public, remaining in the news for 3 weeks now, while other political scandals may last a typical news cycle before it's all but forgotten. Was it the fun headlines you could craft out of this? Was it the social media aspect? Was it because Weiner was one of the more passionate and seemingly upstanding politicians who seemed to have a bright political future?
-r-

As a side note, I do think Weiner did right by resigning. Regardless of whether or not others in his position have or would, there is a standard of conduct that should be expected from elected officials, and cyber-flashing, while relatively mild and even laughable an offense when compared to others, is still disappointing behavior.
-r-

I wonder if the cyberflashing itself was as damaging to Weiner as his response.

In my opinion, the worst offence committed by both of them was LYING.

The comments to this entry are closed.