« The return to morning news of Tannya Joaquin | Main | What Rod Tam and Tom DeLay did »

11/23/2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Press report also said, in addition to the RATE increase was a FEE increase "per container." Together, the two increase seems to amount to closer to 10%!

Doubling your exampled cost increases to cover the actual increase, we all need to recognize that no business is going to pay more fees, rent or anything else (in the long term, at least) without getting back MORE than the increase in what's paid out. Why spend $1,000 more to only get $1,000 back? Of course not! A typical business not operating at big-box scale which has to spend $1,000 (more) is going to want $1,100 or more back in return of its cost of capital. The point is the effect of the Matson cost increases on the ultimate consumer - even after acknowledging that this go-round is more like 8-10% - is higher than the retailer's cost increase.....................................................................................................................................................................[Because a container may cost anywhere from $2,000 to $7,000 depending on what's in it, the percentage increase differs according to "percentage of what" - 10% of $2,000 is $200 while 10% of $7,000 is $700. As for the issue of whether the increased cost is passed through, it depends, as it always does, on (1) what the market will bear, and (2) what the wholesaler/retailer can afford. HMD]

The comments to this entry are closed.